Letter to editor Sidescreen.
It has been said that the cracks in the paint of an old unrestored car can be compared to the smile lines on the face of a beautiful woman. So it is sad when a fellow from SA, allegedly, made some not so nice comments about some of the cars [obviously not his] at the national meeting after the concours. I thought about this and came to the conclusion that he just does not get the fact that ownership of these cars is not just physical, or maybe in his case financial, but you develop an emotional attachment, no matter what condition they are in. This kind of AR attitude is clearly contrary to what I consider the point of owing an old Triumph. Of course I would like to own a perfect concourse ready car, but would I be prepared to hop in it at a moments notice and drive it to Darwin, well no, would I just hop in my unrestored but well looked after car at a moments notice and drive it to Darwin, hell yes. The decrease in concours competition cars of late would not be helped by limiting non concours contenders, surely they make the concourse queens look better. We could all sell our cars and buy an old Jag if we want to pursue perfection. I have thought of restoring my car over the years but then I would miss the driving pleasure whilst the work is underway. Because that is what I think my TR3 is all about, driving pleasure. I come to the concours gatherings for the drive and the chat, not to obsess about the condition, perfect or imperfect, of the other cars there. If the decline in concourse category entry cars is a worry to some people, I think their problem could be solved by scrapping the current arrangements and instigating just three awards. These awards would be 1. Best in show 2. Best modified and 3. Best surviver. The surviver category would be the best unrestored car that has travelled the longest to get to the concourse. Best surviver would be a challenge for the AR set and would have gone to the white long door TR2 from Queensland at this past concours. Unfortunately such a change should require a genuine consensus from the members, not just a fait accompli decision handed down from on high.
Bernard Doherty.
|